There’s nothing like reading weepy 1950s sf about the end of the world to make you briefly weepy, sentimental, confused and distractable.
On the other hand, there are few kinds of nonfiction prose more exhilarating, frustrating, consoling and thought-provoking– yes, all those qualities at once– than the essays and speculations of William Carlos Williams: in between waits for a bus and waits for the photocopier this morning I have been reading The Embodiment of Knowledge, and quite apart from the scholarly uses I expect to make of it this month, it’s got some remarkable bits of quotable prose, viz.:
“Science is a sham to him who sees his city destroyed by gunfire. Philosophy is a cheat to him who has lost that which he loves and knows no better than to weep. Poetry at such moments is terrible, an overwhelming summation of life and the world– never perhaps to be set down, the type of a peculiarly humane knowledge.” (Note how Williams seems about to make an unsustainable claim for actual poems’ ability to sustain and console us– and then tells us that no such poems exist, that the “poetry” which could do all these things is not the kind you can read.)
And: “our schools are based on the principle of a consued mass striving for the unseen summit of a topless cone– and that alone real.”
And: “”Afraid lest he be caught in a net of words, tripped up, bewildered and so defeated– thrown aside– a man hesitates to write down his innermost convictions.” (Not just a man: anyone? Any man?)
For more and better quotations (from novelists and science writers, mostly) just keep reading Jenny, to whom this post constitutes a sort of homage.